Skip to main content
Academic Essay
Southern Methodist University
Master of Liberal Studies · Humanities 6397
Written by Nick (Weilbacher) McCarthy‑Yates · 2016
Content Advisory This essay explores themes of masculinity, sexuality, shame, and adolescent psychology through 20th century American literature and film. Some passages contain mature subject matter. Academic in nature, drawn from Southern Methodist University's Master of Liberal Studies program.

An Essay by Nick (Weilbacher) McCarthy‑Yates

Never
Grow Up

Masculinity, shame, and the making of the American boy,
a century of literature that never stopped asking the same questions.

Scroll to read
Introduction

"Boys will be boys."

And what exactly must that mean?

Surely you have heard the phrase. Is it merely a statement of the obvious? The phrase subliminally declares that boys are expected to behave differently. The details of exactly how differently boys were, and continue, to be expected to behave has been a socio-cultural conversation that has evolved enormously in recent history.

Looking specifically for modern western origins of masculine and juvenile behavior, one cannot overlook the historical context of rapid social change, mass-migrations, newly reformed institutions of education and governance, and an increasingly urban, industrialized economy. Historian Steven Mintz points out that "wrenching social and economic changes… the explosive growth of cities and industry, the rapid movement into the trans-Mississippi West, the sharp increase in foreign immigration… produced patterns of schooling, play and work that differed dramatically by class, ethnicity, gender, race and region."

Lest we forget: millions of lives lost in multiple world wars, the end of the frontier, and the expansion of civil rights, all of which had great impact on the life of young men. Throughout the 20th century, in the midst of so much change, young men faced ever-changing notions of what it meant to be an upright, contributing member of society.

For so many young men, the psychological parameters of these social expectations placed undue burden, feelings of guilt, and heavy-weight anchors on mankind's greatest potential: to love.

Through the critical analysis of select literature, film, and historical sources, we can begin to gain a clearer picture of the obstacles young boys faced in reaching adulthood. Four works anchor this journey across the century, each a marker, each a warning.

1904
Chapter One · Early 1900s
James M. Barrie

Never Growing Up

Peter Pan and the innocence that became a trap

James Barrie's Peter Pan offers one of literature's most enduring images of boyhood frozen in amber. In this tale, Wendy Darling dreams of a boy who whisks her away to Neverland, home to the Lost Boys, Indian tribes, and pirates. She is lured there because the boys need a mother. As she's grown older, she's also begun dreaming of love and adventure.

Through their first meeting, we see that Wendy is far more sexually aware than Peter. She offers him a kiss, then falls back on Victorian propriety and hands him a thimble instead. Peter's complete naivete of her advance speaks to a larger cultural reality: "At the beginning of the twentieth century, many children grew up in an environment of extreme sexual ignorance, superstition, and fear."

Peter has no interest in finding a mate. He wants someone to read bedtime stories. She falls for him. He will not, cannot, leave Neverland and grow up with her. In the end, Wendy grows up "a day quicker than the other girls," while Peter remains forever suspended between childish fantasy and an unclear picture of adulthood.

✦ ✦ ✦

The Boy Scouts of America took a similarly evasive approach to sexuality. Their handbook offered boys this guidance on masturbation:

"In the body of every boy who has reached his teens, the Creator of the Universe has sown a very important fluid… Any habit that causes the fluid to be discharged from the body tends to weaken his strength." Boy Scouts of America Handbook, early 20th century

Boys were given almost no understanding of intimate situations, and embedded with fear, guilt, and shame for partaking in the most basic human experiences. Like Peter, dark about kisses, an entire generation of young men were left in the dark about themselves.

1932
Chapter Two · 1930s
James T. Farrell

The Soul Black with Sin

Young Lonigan and the Catholic iron fist of guilt

Where Peter Pan's era withheld knowledge through ignorance, the 1930s compounded it with shame. James T. Farrell's Young Lonigan gives us Studs, an Irish-Catholic boy in Chicago whose body is becoming something he doesn't understand, and whose church has only one answer for it.

In one pivotal episode, Studs is aroused after a late-night encounter with his sister. The aftermath is rendered in Farrell's unflinching prose, a boy alone in a bathroom, followed by frantic prayer, followed by a sleepless, terrified night.

"Kneeling down at his bedside, he tried to make a perfect act of contrition to wash his soul from sin… was afraid that God might punish him, make him die in the night… His soul was black with sin. He lay in bed, worried, suffering." James T. Farrell, Young Lonigan (1932)

Studs has a lot to learn, not only about how to express sexuality in a healthy manner, but that it's even okay to have natural urges. The institutional forces around him, church, family, neighborhood, offered no such reassurance.

What Peter Pan accomplished through innocence, Lonigan's world accomplished through condemnation. The result in both cases was the same: a young man cut off from his own interior life. Shame where self-knowledge should have been.

1955
Chapter Three · 1950s
Nicholas Ray · Warner Bros.

The Wrong Kind of Sensitive

Rebel Without a Cause and the cost of not fitting the mold

By mid-century, cultural values were shifting, if only slightly. Nicholas Ray's Rebel Without a Cause gives us Jim (James Dean) and his doomed attempt at fitting into post-war suburban masculinity. Jim's father is a pushover. His mother is volatile. His new classmates want to prove his cowardice before they've spoken ten words to him.

The film's central tragedy, though, isn't Jim's, it's Plato's. A boy with no parental oversight, a monthly check, and a lonely heart. Plato's sensitivity, his misplaced affection for Jim, his artistic nature, all treated as pathology. The film ends with him shot dead by police outside the Griffith Observatory.

Cast as a "complete psychopath", willing to murder all because he did not fit the typical social expectations of young men at that time. Plato's crime was feeling too much, too openly, for the wrong person.

The rugged, stoic post-war ethos worked as a social mask. For those who couldn't wear it, the Platos of the world, the consequence was isolation, instability, and in this telling, death.

The message to young men watching from the audience: conform or be Plato.

1951
Chapter Four · 1950s–60s
J.D. Salinger

The Phonies and the Field

Catcher in the Rye and the boy who rejected the script entirely

Holden Caulfield is haunted. His older brother is dead, he's just failed out of another prep school, and he's running away to New York City, the only place where the question of who you're supposed to be might get drowned out by the noise. He is deeply cynical of everything, except his younger sister Phoebe.

For Holden, sexuality is something he wants to explore but can't reconcile with the masculine gender norms being imposed on him. He rejects all that others take for granted.

"You figured most of them would probably marry dopey guys. Guys that always talk about how many miles they get to a gallon in their goddam cars. Guys that get sore and childish as hell if you beat them at golf… Guys that are very boring." J.D. Salinger, The Catcher in the Rye (1951)

In one of the novel's loneliest scenes, Holden hires a prostitute, and only wants to talk to her. She's completely baffled. She rips him off anyway.

His critique isn't targeted at one sex. It's aimed at the entire performance of heteronormative dating life, the phoniness of it, the way it asks young men to become dull and impenetrable in order to participate. For Caulfield, being a 20th century boy means adhering to strict masculine guidelines. And he entirely refuses.

In refusing, he ends up more alone than Studs, more lost than Peter, more alienated than Jim. But perhaps more honest than any of them.

Conclusion

What Boys Carry Forward

A cautionary archive, a century in review

On the surface, Peter Pan, Young Lonigan, Jim, and Holden Caulfield don't share much. Different eras, different cities, different circumstances. But the tendencies running through their stories, longing for acceptance, questioning authority, cultivating a defiant self-reliance, compose a recognizable portrait.

Each is a marker for the modern-day young man. Eventually, you must grow up and stop living in fantasy. You will have to fight for respect and honor from your peers. You will, at some point, have to reckon with your own sexuality, accept it, shape it, or reject it.

Each story is also a cautionary tale: a life void of such assimilation is a life of loneliness, isolation, and sadness. "Boys will be boys" continues to evolve, and in studying a century's worth of expectations, we begin to understand what, exactly, we should leave behind.

What the literature argues, collectively, is that the damage done to young men by silence, shame, rigid performance, and institutional neglect was not inevitable. It was chosen, by institutions, cultural norms, and the adults who built the world those boys inherited. Knowing that is the first step toward building something different.

Independent Work

Available for writing & editorial projects

Nick is a writer and digital strategist open to independent writing, content, and editorial collaborations. Reach out to start a conversation.

n626@proton.me

Share Your Thoughts

Did this resonate with you?

Reactions, reflections, disagreements, all welcome. This essay lives in conversation.

Write to Nick

Never Grow Up

Written by Nick (Weilbacher) McCarthy‑Yates · 2016

Southern Methodist University · Master of Liberal Studies · Humanities 6397

Works Cited James T. Farrell, Studs Lonigan (Signet Classics, 1932)
James M. Barrie, Peter Pan (Charles Scribner's Sons, 1911)
Nicholas Ray, Rebel Without a Cause (Warner Bros., 1955)
Steven Mintz, Huck's Raft (Belknap Press / Harvard University Press, 2004)
Links above are affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
↑ Back to top